Chapters

• Data retention and legal challenges
• What we will be talking about
• Directive 2006/24/EC: The Data Retention Directive
• Purpose
• Data retention under Directive 2002/58/EC
• However
• Article 15
• Data retention under Directive 2006/24/EC
• Data to be stored includes
• Why?
• Challenges (1/2)
• Challenges (2/2)
• The Digital Rights Ireland decision
• Case C-293/12
• Case C-594/12
• The question to be decided
• The Advocate-General’s Opinion
• The Court’s reasoning (1/3)
• The Court’s reasoning (2/3)
• The Court’s reasoning (3/3)
• The Court’s decision
• The Tele2 Sverige decision
• Case C-203/2015 (1/3)
• Case C-203/2015 (2/3)
• Case C-203/2015 (3/3)
• Case C-698/2015 (1/2)
• Case C-698/2015 (2/2)
• The Court’s reasoning
• A new criterion
• Clear and precise rules
• The Court’s decision (1/2)
• The Court’s decision (2/2)
• Case law evolution
• The Privacy International decision
• First question
• Answer
• Second question (1/2)
• Second question (2/2)
• Answer (1/4)
• Answer (2/4)
• Answer (3/4)
• Answer (4/4)
• Requirements for legislation (1/2)
• Requirements for legislation (2/2)
• Evolution of case law
• The Quadrature du net decision
• Evolution of case law
• Par. 138
• Par. 139
• What about Legislative measures
• Par. 148
• What about IP addresses?
• Par. 152
• Par. 153
• Par. 155
• Par. 157
• Par. 158
• Conclusion
• The Prokuratuur decision
• Conclusion
• Conclusion (3rd question) (1/2)
• Conclusion (3rd question) (2/2)
• The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána decision
• Evolution of case law
• par. 72
• Can the police be considered an independent authority in order to access traffic and location data?
• Par. 122
• Par. 123
• Par. 127
• The impact in national legislation
• The decisions’ impact
• The Court’s decisions