Preventing and Acting Upon Discrimination in AI Systems

Robin Allen presents key factors of discrimination by Artificial Intelligence systems across multiple sectors. He explains different approaches to regulate AI systems and new technologies, varying from ethical principles to specific regulatory legislation, and focuses on key elements of the EU’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act.

Robin Allen

Information

Standard version

This version of the e-presentation allows you to jump back and forward to the section of most interest.
No certificate can be provided for using this version.

Start

Question 1 of 3

Question 1: Merely holding a patent does not necessarily confer a dominant position according to EU competition law.

True.

False.

Question 2 of 3

Question 2: Bringing legal proceedings in patent cases may be abusive if the following conditions are met:

They cannot reasonably be considered to reflect an attempt to assert rights, such that they only serve to harass the other party; and they are conceived in the framework of a plan to eliminate competition.

They are unintentionally creating a dominant position and a barrier to trade.

Question 3 of 3

Question 3: Settlements between an originator and (potential) generic entrants that have the effect of delaying the entry of a generic on the market are:

Considered to be anticompetitive per se even if there is non monetary value transfer.

Usually considered to be anticompetitive when there is a value transfer.

Considered not to be anticompetitive even if there is a value transfer.

Preventing and Acting Upon Discrimination in AI Systems

Information

Standard version

Certified version

Chapters