Mutual trust and fundamental rights protection in the Dublin system

The presentation deals with legal issues created by the differing case law of the Court of Justice and of the European Court of Human Rights in relation to the Dublin system.

Constantin Hruschka

Information

Standard version

This version of the e-presentation allows you to jump back and forward to the section of most interest.
No certificate can be provided for using this version.

Start

Question 1 of 2

Question 1: According to the European Court of Justice, when deciding whether to transfer an applicant for asylum to another Member State under the Dublin system:

the competent national authority shall assess the individual situation of the asylum seeker.

the competent national authority shall proceed with the transfer unless it has reasons to believe that there are systemic deficiencies in the asylum system of the receiving State.

Question 2 of 2

Question 2: In its Opinion 2/13, the Court of Justice ruled:

against EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights.

in favour of EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights.

Mutual trust and fundamental rights protection in the Dublin system

Information

Standard version

Certified version

Chapters

Question 1 of 2

Question 1: According to the European Court of Justice, when deciding whether to transfer an applicant for asylum to another Member State under the Dublin system:

Question 2 of 2

Question 2: In its Opinion 2/13, the Court of Justice ruled:

Summary

e-Presentation ended