Current jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on matters related to asylum

This presentation tackles the recent case law of the European Court of Human Rights on matters related to asylum and critically assesses the alleged discrepancy between the ECtHR case law and the CJEU case law.

Thomas Straub

Information

Standard version

This version of the e-presentation allows you to jump back and forward to the section of most interest.
No certificate can be provided for using this version.

Start

Question 1 of 2

**Question 1: In Tarakhel v. Switzerland, the ECtHR ruled that**

There are systemic deficiencies in the asylum system in Italy.

Not every Dublin transfer to Italy violates Art. 3. of the ECHR.

The sending state is exempt from carrying out a thorough examination of the situation of the person concerned because of the principle of mutual trust.

Question 2 of 2

**Question 2: In M.E. v. Sweden, the dissenting opinion criticised that:**

the majority should reject the claim on the grounds of credibility concerns.

the majority should reject the claim since the applicant was not homosexual.

the majority found concealment for certain period of time to be tolerable.

Current jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on matters related to asylum

Information

Standard version

Certified version

Chapters

Question 1 of 2

**Question 1: In Tarakhel v. Switzerland, the ECtHR ruled that**

Question 2 of 2

**Question 2: In M.E. v. Sweden, the dissenting opinion criticised that:**

Summary

e-Presentation ended